New BRA Director Peter Meade is a Mediocre Choice
Mayor Menino has picked Back Bay resident Peter Meade as the new director of the Boston Redevelopment Authority. This is not a bold or inspiring choice by the mayor.
On Tuesday, Boston Mayor Thomas M. Menino announced the appointment of Peter Meade as the new director of the Boston Redevelopment Authority (BRA). The move comes two weeks after its current director, Thomas Palmieri, submitted his resignation. Palmieri’s last day will be May 1.
The newspapers have been full of effusive praise for Mr. Meade, a Back Bay resident and born-and-bred Bostonian. He sincerely sounds as though he's a great guy.
Buried deep in each article, however, was the fact that Meade has no redevelopment experience. He has worked in both the public and private sectors, notably at Boston City Hall and for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts but never, from what I can tell, in construction, architecture, or real estate.
Compare his resume with that of out-going director John Palmieri. Palmieri came to Boston after spending several years working on housing initiatives in Hartford, Connecticut, Charlotte, North Carolina, and after 18-years in Providence, Rhode Island under its then-Mayor, Buddy Cianci.
Although the Mayor remarked that Meade “knows Boston” and that, “He can call any CEO in Boston, and they will pick up the phone”, I don’t see how that qualifies him for the position of director. The Boston Business Journal estimates that Boston has 242 commercial projects worth $27.5 billion currently under review, covering 90-million square feet of space. That the city of Boston needs someone with the knowledge and experience of development, its funding and processes, should seem obvious to just about everyone.
The list of un-built projects in Boston is long; there’s Filene's, the hundreds of acres in the Seaport District, the hundreds of acres that Harvard University is sitting on in Allston, and developments new and in-process for the Massachusetts Turnpike, to name just a few.
Meade’s recent experiences include chairman of the Rose Kennedy Greenway Conservancy and president of the Edward M Kennedy Institute for the US Senate. Neither project is complete - Meade left the Kennedy museum before it broke ground, while the Greenway Conservancy is still foundering in the wake of his departure. (The Conservancy this week resorted to asking for $5 donations from people so it could plant some rosebushes.)
Seeing as Meade will begin his job at the end of his professional career (starting his job at age 65 whereas Palmieri was just 56 years old), you can only wonder why Menino chose him. A mayor who was planning major new initiatives would want someone by his side who had grand visions and was up-to-date on everything that’s going on, far and wide, in regard to real estate, development, and municipal growth and prosperity.
Meade fits none of that criteria.
In my opinion, this was about as “safe” a move as could be by Mayor Menino. I’d even call it ‘lazy’. I think the Mayor only wanted to find a “place-holder” to ride out the rest of the mayor’s current tenure. Any new mayor of Boston will want to put his/her own pick on the board of the BRA. If the Mayor was planning on sticking around awhile, he would have chosen someone else, someone more suitable for a city of our size. I think this move proves he’s no longer thinking very far ahead.
With this pick, the Mayor has guaranteed pretty much nothing will happen until his reign is over.
John Keith
8:53 pm on Thursday, April 7, 2011
There may be a correction to this story. In an interview with Emily Rooney on 'Greater Boston', Mr Meade said that he is "still there" at the Kennedy Institute and will be at its ground-breaking on Friday.
I relied on what I read in the Boston Globe to put together that part of my column. I believe he is planning on leaving, but the actual timing of his departuret, I do not know.
Larry Rinaldi
10:12 am on Friday, April 8, 2011
I detect some age discrimination here. Sanders started Kentucky Fried Chicken at age sixty-five and he was living off Social Security. To say a person's career is over at sixty-five years of age is nonsense in this day and age.
David Ertischek
5:15 pm on Friday, April 8, 2011
I don't think the author's column has anything to do with age discrimination. Keith wrote, "(Meade) has worked in both the public and private sectors, notably at Boston City Hall and for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts but never, from what I can tell, in construction, architecture, or real estate."
What are Meade's qualifications for the job? The author's opinion sounds like he believes Meade was appointed because he knows people. But does he know about the BRA and their goals and mission?
Larry Rinaldi
11:34 pm on Friday, April 8, 2011
The article stated Peter Meade was at the end of his professional career and mentioned his age at sixty-five. The heading of the article is Peter Meade is a mediocre choice. Does a person have to have experience in construction, or architecture to be effective in city planning? Homeowners add value to property not real estate agents. Ageism is just another way to marginalize a candidate for public office.
Gtree
9:15 am on Saturday, April 9, 2011
The biggger question is, What is he going to do about Building 108 in Navy Yard?